Legal Opinion

State v. Khoshnaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 3, 2010No. 070733253, A138146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant, who was convicted of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, and one count of unlawful use of a firearm, ORS 166.250, argues on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. The trial court’s factual findings are binding on appeal as long as there is constitutionally sufficient evidence to support them. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993). We therefore review the record, and all inferences that it will support, in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings. Id. As explained below, this is one of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. TowaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API