Romanski v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The principal issue in this appeal is whether Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential) or Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia (Yellow Cab) became liable to Michael Romanski for no-fault insurance benefits 1 following an accident which occurred while Romanski was driving a taxi. The trial court entered summary judgment against Prudential for no-fault benefits and also for counsel fees. We affirm the judgment for no-fault benefits but reverse the award of counsel fees.
On March 31, 1982, Romanski was injured when the taxicab which he was operating was involved…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Toth v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Feller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Exxon Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Lee v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.