Legal Opinion

Romanski v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1986No. 2720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The principal issue in this appeal is whether Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential) or Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia (Yellow Cab) became liable to Michael Romanski for no-fault insurance benefits 1 following an accident which occurred while Romanski was driving a taxi. The trial court entered summary judgment against Prudential for no-fault benefits and also for counsel fees. We affirm the judgment for no-fault benefits but reverse the award of counsel fees.

On March 31, 1982, Romanski was injured when the taxicab which he was operating was involved…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Toth v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Feller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Exxon Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Lee v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Federal Kemper Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API