Legal Opinion

Feller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1950No. Appeal, 151PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The question is whether a certain purchasing agent was an employee of plaintiffs within the meaning of a “blanket position bond” which defendant had issued to them. The bond agreed to indemnify them against any loss of money or other property through theft or embezzlement committed by any of their employees.

On May 12, 1947, one Edward J. Van Tassell was engaged by plaintiffs to buy and sell automobiles on their behalf, they being dealers in used cars. On May 27, 1947, he received from them the sum of $3,100 for the purpose of purchasing certain automobiles;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Magarian v. Southern Fruit DistributorsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Joseph v. United Workers Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Eckert v. Merchants Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. McCARTHY v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Green v. Independent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. J. Miller Co. v. MixterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API