Legal Opinion

Nye-Schneider-Fowler Co. v. Bridges, Hoye & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1915No. 18890PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Dodge county: George H. Tpiomas, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

The attorneys for the parties in this case have made good use of rule 14 (94 Neb. XIII) of this court. By so doing they have saved themselves and the court much labor and their clients much expense. It appears that there were pending in the district court for Dodge county four several cases, all involving the same legal quéstions. These questions were determined by the district court in each of the four cases, and thereupon the counsel representing the respective parties entered into a stipulation under rule 14, which provides for a case stated. The case stated begins with these words: “In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Des Moines Bridge & Iron Works v. Marxen & RokahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bond v. DolbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ParkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. White v. RourkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. McMillan v. Joseph P. Casey Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API