Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Joseph P. Casey Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1924No. 15820PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

A bill of complaint was filed by E. S. and R. E. McMillan, as co-partners, the purpose of which was the enforcing of a mechanic’s lien by them, as sub-contractors, for a claimed balance of $2876.65 for grading and excavating on a public highway in Vermilion county being constructed by the Joseph P. Casey Company, incorporated, under contract with the county. Answers were filed by several defendants, and certain other claimants filed cross-bills. The Mid-Western Company, one of the cross-complainants, in its cross-bill claimed a lien as sub-contractor for furnishing the contractor certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. F. E. Brown & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Standard Boiler Works v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Nye-Schneider-Fowler Co. v. Bridges, Hoye & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Alexander Lumber Co. v. Farmer CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Anderson v. Villiage of BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co. v. W. C. Caye & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Koenig v. McCARTHY CONSTR. CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  5. D. D. Kennedy, Inc. v. Lake Petersburg Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API