Legal Opinion

Rachel Amy Maurer v. Fremont Insurance Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 2018No. 336514PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

In December 2012, plaintiff Rachel Amy Maurer 1 was catastrophically injured in an automobile accident. Her car, along with all the family cars, had been insured with defendant Fremont Insurance Company since 2006. In October 2014, almost two years after the accident, Fremont advised plaintiff's husband, Dale Maurer, who was the policyholder, that the policy was being rescinded by the company retroactive to 2006 and that it therefore had no obligation to pay for any of plaintiff's medical treatment, replacement services, or wage loss related to the 2012 accident.

Plaintiff sought a declaratory…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stanton v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carol Petra Bartosiewicz v. A2q LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Estate of James D Branch v. Kevin RudolphMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Friendship Jackson LLC v. Friendship Forest Pk Ltd Div HousingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Kenneth Loney v. Steven T SleevaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Niles Johnson v. USA UnderwritersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API