In Re Franklin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
In this case we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of the procedures (Pen. Code, §§ 1026, 1026a) for the commitment and release of persons who, following trial for a criminal offense, are acquitted by reason of their insanity. We have concluded that these procedures, whereby such persons may be confined in a state hospital for a minimum period of 90 days pending a hearing on the question whether they should be released to society, fulfill the requirements of due process and equal protection of the laws and should be sustained. In particular, we hold that the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- State v. KrolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. FeagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re MoyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.