Legal Opinion

People v. Feagley

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1975No. Crim. 16818PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In In re Lynch (1972) 8 Cal.3d 410 [105 Cal.Rptr. 217, 503 P.2d 921], we held that the cruel or unusual punishment clause of the California Constitution prohibits the state from confining a nonviolent sexual offender in prison for a wholly indeterminate period which may extend to the end of his life. In the case at bar we are called upon to decide whether the state may achieve essentially the same result by the device of declaring the person to be a “mentally disordered sex offender” and “civilly” committing him for an indefinite period to an “institutional unit” on the grounds…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API