Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Frankel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 22, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned her position as a medical technician citing a litany of grievances, including the employer’s elimination of health insurance coverage and his closing of a pension and profit sharing plan. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that claimant had left her employment without good cause. We affirm. Our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of WigutowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the Claim of BrabsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BartczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of PapaleoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of ZevallosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re the Claim of BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API