Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Orenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 3, 1989, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, *1030that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The question of whether a claimant has refused alternative employment without good cause is a question of fact for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (Matter of Consentino [Ross], 71 AD2d 1042). Here, the record supports the conclusion that claimant left her job because of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re the Claim of ConsentinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consumer Action Network v. TielmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In re the Claim of StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of KabuyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API