In re the Claim of Orenstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 3, 1989, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, *1030that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
The question of whether a claimant has refused alternative employment without good cause is a question of fact for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (Matter of Consentino [Ross], 71 AD2d 1042). Here, the record supports the conclusion that claimant left her job because of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Claim of ConsentinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consumer Action Network v. TielmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re the Claim of StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of KabuyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997