Legal Opinion

Berry Petroleum Co. v. Adams & Peck

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 4, 1976No. C-75-484; No. 37PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*394OPINION AND ORDER

Before JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman, and EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON*, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, STANLEY A. WEIGEL *, and ANDREW A. CAFFREY, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

The Panel initially transferred sixteen actions brought by stockholders of Commonwealth United Corporation and Seeburg Corporation to the Southern District of New York and assigned them to the Honorable Frank H. McFadden, sitting by designation, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. In re Seeburg-Commonwealth United Merger Litigation, 312…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,223, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,220 Berry Petroleum Company, an Arkansas Corp. (Dissolved) v. Adams & PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United MergerUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
  3. In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United MergerUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  4. In Re Multidistrict Litigation Resulting From the Seeburg-Commonwealth United MergerUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  5. In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United Merger LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Seeburg-Com. United Merger LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API