Legal Opinion
In Re Multidistrict Litigation Resulting From the Seeburg-Commonwealth United Merger
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided October 20, 1971No. 37PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
By previous Order and Opinion the Panel transferred sixteen actions brought by stockholders and former stockholders of the Commonwealth United Corp. and the Seeburg Corporation to the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings before Judge Frank H. McFad den. In re Seeburg-Commonwealth United Litigation, 312 F.Supp. 909 (J.P.M.L. 1970). Since that time seven additional actions have been transferred to that District. See, e. g., In re Seeburg-Commonwealth United Litigation, 331 F. Supp. 552 (J.P.M.L. Sept. 1,1971). Commonwealth United…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United MergerUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United MergerUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
4Cited by4 opinions
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,223, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,220 Berry Petroleum Company, an Arkansas Corp. (Dissolved) v. Adams & PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In Re Seeburg-Com. United Merger LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United Merger LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- Berry Petroleum Co. v. Adams & PeckUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976