In Re Seeburg-Commonwealth United Merger
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
There are two principal corporate parties to this multidistrict litigation. They are Commonwealth United Corporation (“Commonwealth” hereinafter) and Seeburg Corporation (“Seeburg” hereinafter). The twelve actions listed on Schedule A have been brought by stockholders of Commonwealth individually, as representatives of a class composed of all stockholders and derivatively on behalf of the corporation itself. 1 Commonwealth and Kleiner Bell & Company, Commonwealth’s investment broker and financial consultant, are defendants in all these actions. Various cf. ficers and…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Revenue Properties Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
4Cited by12 opinions
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,223, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,220 Berry Petroleum Company, an Arkansas Corp. (Dissolved) v. Adams & PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re San Juan, Puerto Rico Air Crash Disaster LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In re Alsco-Harvard Fraud LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.