Legal Opinion

Shoults v. Alderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1921No. Civ. No. 3924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the superior court upon proceedings upon a writ of review, which judgment affirmed the proceedings of the respondents acting as the board of medical examiners of the state of California.

The only question before this court upon this appeal is: Did the board of medical examiners exceed its jurisdiction in making the order complained of? (Sec. 1068, Code Civ. Proc.; Jordan v. Alderson, 48 Cal. App. 547 [192 Pac. 170].) The facts pertinent to a determination of that question are:

Petitioner was duly and regularly licensed to practice as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Jordan v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

Millsap v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
Janeway v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
Powers v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
People v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1949
People v. ChristieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949