People v. Christie
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.
Defendant was convicted in a trial by jury of violating section 15 of the Chiropractic Act [Stats. 1923, p. xx, 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 4811], an initiative measure adopted by the people in November, 1922. Defendant is a licensee under the act and held himself out to the public by business cards and a sign on his office window as a “chiropractic physician. ’ ’ The jury was instructed, in effect, that if they found the defendant used the word “physician” they must find him guilty under the act. On appeal, defendant makes no contention that the section is unconstitutional. It is his position…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Helping Hand Home for Children v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- In Re RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cooper v. State Board of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. ChristieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Opinion No. (2001), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2001