Legal Opinion

People v. Christie

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1949No. Nov. 25, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

95 Cal.App.2d Supp. 919 (1949)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

JAMES K. CHRISTIE, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

Nov. 25, 1949.

Stanford & McDonough for Appellant.

James Don Keller, District Attorney, and Ned A. Kimball, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

BURCH, J.

Defendant was convicted in a trial by jury of violating section 15 of the Chiropractic Act [Stats. 1923, p. xx, 2 Deering's Gen. Laws, Act 4811], an initiative measure adopted by the people in November, 1922. Defendant is a licensee under the act and held himself out to the public by business cards and a sign on his office window…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Helping Hand Home for Children v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. In Re RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. State Board of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Opinion No. (2001), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2001
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API