Diehl v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
The controlling question raised on this appeal is whether the discharge of a rule for indemnity taken by one of two joint tortfeasors is res judicata of a rule for contribution between the same parties. The court below held that it was not and made the rule absolute. The order will be affirmed.
Plaintiff in this action in trespass recovered a verdict against both defendants for personal injuries sus tained as a result of a fall on the sidewalk of a building owned by Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co., hereinafter called Fidelity. Steam from an exhaust head on a building…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Trerotola v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mixter v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973