Barnett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Philip M. Carey, J. E. Rodgers, A. F. Bray, Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche and Mortimer B. Veale for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
These four actions were consolidated by stipulation and tried together at the same time. The plaintiffs sued for damages resulting from a collision with an overland train operated by the defendant and an automobile driven by Raymond Hallmark near the town of Antioch. The verdicts were returned in favor of Lela Barnett and her infant child in the sum of $10,000; in favor of Smith Casner in the sum of $5,000; in favor of Zula Hallmark and her two minor children in the sum of $15,000, and in favor of Hollace Taylor in the sum of $6,000. The defendant has appealed from each of the judgments upon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.