McNichols v. Southern Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
This action was brought under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 459, as amended, to establish the plaintiff’s right to certain reemployment benefits. Jurisdiction is conferred on this court by Section 9(d).
The Southern Railway Company was originally named as a defendant but has been dismissed by agreement of the parties.
The parties are in substantial agreement as to the relevant facts which may be stated as follows.
*149The plaintiff was employed by the defendant, Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Diehl v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- James W. Mann v. Crowell-Collier Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Jack H. Bassett v. The Texas & Pacific Railway Company, and System Federation No. 121 of Railway Employees' Department, A.F. Of l.-c.i.o.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fortenberry v. OWEN BROTHERS PACKING COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1966
- Donald I. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Wilfred L. Beck, Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Guy H. McClearn Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Taylor v. Southern Pacific Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1969