Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Southern Pacific Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 19, 1969No. Civ. No. 47289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND DECISION

GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge.

This case is brought under the provisions of Section 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, as amended (50 U.S.C.A. App. § 459) 1 [hereinafter “the Act”]. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by Section 9(b) of the Act.

The facts of this case appear in an agreed pretrial order dated January 24, 1969. To summarize briefly, Plaintiff Taylor [hereinafter “Taylor”] was initi*608ally employed by Defendant Southern Pacific Company [hereinafter “Southern Pacific”] on July 19, 1961, in the “other than temporary” position of locomotive…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Derepkowski v. Smith-Lee Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
  3. Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API