Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Cheatham

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Douglas F. Young, J.

This action was commenced by plaintiff husband to recover damages for breach of one of the provisions of a stipulation entered into between him and the defendant wife on February 14, 1974. The stipulation was entered into in open court as a settlement in a divorce action instituted by the defendant wife. The provision in question is unusual in that it provides that the defendant wife is to pay the plaintiff husband $125 per week as "alimony, if you will”. Plaintiff seeks judgment in the amount of $11,000 for arrears from September 20, 1974 to June 4,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Hardt v. HeidweyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caplan v. Unimax Holdings Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Fox v. Wiener Laces, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tip Top Farms, Inc. v. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API