Hardt v. Heidweyer
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. On April 23, 1889, the appellants as plaintiffs, citizens of the State of New York, filed their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, making as defendants the following persons, citizens of the State of Illinois: Sigismund Heidweyer, Norbert Stieglitz, the National Bank of Illinois, Siegmund Florsheim, Philip Florsheim, and Simon…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. On April 23, 1889, the appellants as plaintiffs, citizens of the State of New York, filed their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, making as defendants the following persons, citizens of the State of Illinois: Sigismund Heidweyer, Norbert Stieglitz, the National Bank of Illinois, Siegmund Florsheim, Philip Florsheim, and Simon Florsheim. On January 15, 1890, they filed an amendment to their bill. To the bill,' with its amendment, the defendants demurred…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer
It will be perceived that nowhere in the bill is .it alleged that the failing debtors Heidweyer & Stieglitz ever executed any formal written assignment for the benefit of creditors. It is charged that they gave to certain creditors judgment notes, and assigned and delivered their bills and accounts to one of the creditors in trust; that these .judgment notes, with the proceedings had thereon, and the assignments of bills receivable and accounts, were in effect but one instrument and one transaction, and constituted a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; and this, as plaintiffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Felix v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Hayes v. Port of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kinter v. Commonwealth Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Anatoly Michaelovich Kozulin Lioudmila Nikolaevna Larina v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Franklin v. Dynamic Details, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Piper v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.