Legal Opinion

Gull v. Constam

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 22, 1952No. Civ. A. 3504PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOUS, District Judge.

This is an action upon a Swiss judgment. In so far as is pertinent, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff was divorced from the defendant under a final judgment of the District Court of the Canton of Zurich, Third Division, Switzerland;' that the divorce decree included a money judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant,- and that this judgment has not been satisfied in full. Relief is prayed for in the amount of the balance due on the foreign judgment.

The defendant has interposed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Johnston v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Spann v. Compania Mexicana Radiodifusora Fronteriza, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. Compania Mexicana Rediodifusora Franteriza v. SpannDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941
  5. 164 East 72nd Street Corp. v. IsmayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bata v. HillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  2. Bata v. HillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  3. Milhoux v. LinderColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Hooker Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  5. Hunt v. BP Exploration Co. (Libya) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API