Legal Opinion
164 East 72nd Street Corp. v. Ismay
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1944No. Civ. 3310PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNARD, P. J.—
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend.
The action was brought for the purpose of establishing an English judgment. The complaint is in the usual form and alleges that the judgment, which is described, was duly entered in the High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, in London, England, on June 25, 1935; that it remains a valid and subsisting judgment which is in full force and effect; that it has never been modified; and that no appeal has been taken therefrom. Facts are also alleged showing that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Ryder v. RyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. D'A PhilippoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955
- Ponce ex rel. Monzón González v. F. Badrena e Hijos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- Kertesz v. OstrovskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Renoir v. Redstar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Barnett v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.