Legal Opinion

Compania Mexicana Rediodifusora Franteriza v. Spann

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 14, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Somewhat amplifying, by request, the oral opinion rendered at the conclusion of testimony, I call attention to the fact that this is a suit upon a judgment of a high nisi prius court of the Republic of Mexico, affirmed by an intermediate appellate court, and by the Supreme court of that nation.

Defendant Spann employed a Mexican attorney who instituted suit against the plaintiff in this cause for alleged defamation for $50,000. Spann was cast in that suit by the courts above mentioned. Under the statutes of Mexico, the defendant in that action was granted $6,000 in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. John P. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Hunt v. BP Exploration Co.(Libya) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
  4. Spann v. Compania Mexicana Radiodifusora Fronteriza, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  5. Gull v. ConstamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API