Compania Mexicana Rediodifusora Franteriza v. Spann
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Somewhat amplifying, by request, the oral opinion rendered at the conclusion of testimony, I call attention to the fact that this is a suit upon a judgment of a high nisi prius court of the Republic of Mexico, affirmed by an intermediate appellate court, and by the Supreme court of that nation.
Defendant Spann employed a Mexican attorney who instituted suit against the plaintiff in this cause for alleged defamation for $50,000. Spann was cast in that suit by the courts above mentioned. Under the statutes of Mexico, the defendant in that action was granted $6,000 in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. John P. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Hunt v. BP Exploration Co.(Libya) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- Spann v. Compania Mexicana Radiodifusora Fronteriza, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Gull v. ConstamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.