Legal Opinion
State v. Bemer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 14, 2021No. SC20195PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. BRUCE JOHN BEMER (SC 20195) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Vertefeuille, Js.* Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 54-102a (a)), a court presiding over a pending case involving a violation of certain sex offenses, including patronizing a prostitute who was the victim of human trafficking, may order that the accused be examined for any sexually transmitted disease (STD). Pursuant further to statute (§ 54-102a (b)), a court presiding over a pending case involving a violation of certain sex offenses during which a sexual act occurred,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- GenConn Energy, LLC v. Public Utilities Regulatory AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
- Northland Investment Corp. v. Public Utilities Regulatory AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023