Legal Opinion
Huthnance v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 15, 2008No. Civil Action No. 06-1871 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before me for resolution of certain discovery motions. Currently pending and ready for resolution is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiffs Responses to Their Interrogatories (“Defs.Mot.”) [# 46]. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion will be granted.
DISCUSSION1
In this motion, defendants seek to compel plaintiffs answers to defendants’ interrogatories. First, defendants argue that they are entitled to interrogatory responses which are in plaintiffs “own words.” Defendants’ Memorandum of Points and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walls v. PaulsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Diversified Products Corp. v. Sports Center Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Kendrick v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- United States v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- (PC) Spence v. KaurDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.