Legal Opinion
Kendrick v. Sullivan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 13, 1989No. Civ. No. 83-3175 (CRR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The parties to the above-captioned action are mired in a discovery dispute. The defendants (“HHS”) have served interrogatories upon the plaintiffs, which the plaintiffs have refused to answer. HHS has moved to compel immediate answers to the interrogatories under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a). For the reasons stated herein, HHS’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. The denial, however, shall be (except as to certain specified interrogatories) without prejudice to HHS’ ability to rewrite and reserve the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Kendrick v. BowenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- O'Brien v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Sherrod v. BreitbartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- AKARD v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- DoorDash, Inc. v. City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.