Legal Opinion

Barnes v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2006-0315PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION *

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are three discovery motions: defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses or Preclude Plaintiffs from Using Certain Evidence, May 22, 2012, ECF No. 351; defendant’s Motion to Strike, Or, In the Alternative, For Extension of Time and Leave to Designate Rebuttal Expert(s), June 29, 2012, ECF No. 365; and plaintiffs’ Non-Consent Amended and Re-Stated Motion to Compel Production of the Release Discrepancy Database, June 25, 2012, ECF No. 362. Upon consideration of the motions, the oppositions and replies thereto, and the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Smith v. Washington Post CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Shea v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. In re Denture Cream Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API