Legal Opinion

Barnes v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2006-0315Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CARL A. BARNES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 06-cv-315 (RCL) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are three discovery motions: defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses or Preclude Plaintiffs from Using Certain Evidence, May 22, 2012, ECF No. 351; defendant’s Motion to Strike, Or, In the Alternative, For Extension of Time and Leave to Designate Rebuttal Expert(s), June 29, 2012, ECF No. 365; and plaintiffs’ Non-Consent Amended and Re-Stated Motion to Compel Production of the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Nourison Rug Corp. v. ParvizianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API