Legal Opinion
Cates v. Regents of the New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1998No. 23900PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
[1] Plaintiff Carol Cates, as personal representative of the estate of Cecil Cates, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and the Regents of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (N.M.Teeh). We affirm.
PROCEEDINGS
[2] In 1994, Cates filed a claim against N.M. Tech with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission under the New Mexico Human Rights Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 28-1-1 to -14 (1969, prior to 1995 amendment), after N.M. Tech terminated his employment. Cates alleged that he was unlawfully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Perry v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Orr v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Lobato v. New Mexico Environment DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Cates v. REGENTS NMIM & TNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.