Legal Opinion

Lobato v. New Mexico Environment Department

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 2013No. 12-2128PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Michael Lobato was a probationary employee at the New Mexico Environmental Department’s Farmington office. His status as a probationary employee meant he could be fired at will and without a right to appeal the decision, so long as the department’s reasons were provided in writing. Before completing his probationary period, Lobato was fired. In a letter explaining its decision, NMED cited Lobato’s dishonesty, failure to cooperate with management, and unprofessional attitude toward coworkers and the public.

Lobato, who is Hispanic and of Mexican ancestry, alleges that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. DePaula v. Easter Seals El MiradorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Bird v. West Valley CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Hiatt v. Colorado SeminaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Ward v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Kramer v. Wasatch County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API