Legal Opinion
Tutsch v. Director-General of Railroads
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 3615PublishedCited by 14 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the action, which followed an order of the court sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint and an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss.
It appears from the complaint that on July 24, 1919, plaintiff, due to the negligence of the Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, sustained personal injuries, and for the recovery of damages therefor she, on July 23, 1920, filed a complaint wherein the Director-General of Railroads of the United States was made sole defendant. In due time said defendant filed his demurrer and motion to dismiss the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Price v. United States & Osage IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mills v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- United States ex rel. Rauch v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Vassau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Davis v. Naugatuck Valley Crucible Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.