Legal Opinion

Davis v. Dawkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 23, 1922No. 4 Div. 8PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for injury to stock being transported by a common carrier; and error is assigned of the failure to give the general affirmative charge requested in writing by defendant. To the complaint, in Code form, the defendant replied by the general issue and special plea as follows:

“That, if the mule was injured as the result of any defect in the car in which it was transported, that the defendant is not liable for said injury for that, in the contract of shipment under which the said mule was shipped, in consideration of the reduced rates of freight or special rate of freight, it was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bugg v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. B. F. Kay & Son v. Alabama Cotton & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Davis v. Naugatuck Valley Crucible Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Mellon v. American Flour & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  5. Davis v. ZimmernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API