Legal Opinion

In Re Blum

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 15, 2000No. Bankruptcy 99-16973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JEFFERY P. HOPKINS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) for substantial abuse pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) filed by the United States Trustee. The Blums filed a response (Doc. 20) and a hearing was held on April 27, 2000. Based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the Court concludes that the motion should be granted.

I

Section 707(b) provides in material part:

After notice and a hearing, the court, on ... a motion by the United States Trustee ... may dismiss a case filed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Charles Ellsworth Krohn AKA Charles E. Krohn, Appellant/debtorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Kim Michael Fonder, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re Luisa V. AnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re AttanasioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
  5. In Re FultonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re VansickelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  2. In Re AustinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  3. In Re SummerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  4. Clippard v. Russell (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2008
  5. In Re SiemenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API