Legal Opinion

Erwin N. Foxman and Edith C. Foxman v. John P. Renison

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 16, 1980No. 637, Docket 79-6165PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:

The question in this case is whether appellants have a Fifth Amendment cause of action against appellee, a former Internal Revenue Service agent, for alleged misconduct during an IRS audit of appellants. The district court held that they have not. and granted appellee's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Appellant Erwin N. Foxman is a dentist who practices in Rochester, New York. Appellant Edith C. Foxman is his wife. In November 1970, the IRS commenced an audit of their 1969 tax return. Appellee John P. Renison, then an IRS agent, conducted the audit. After…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Riland v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Vallone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. William H. Zuhone, Jr. And Audra M. Zuhone v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Penn-Field Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API