Legal Opinion

William H. Zuhone, Jr. And Audra M. Zuhone v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 28, 1989No. 88-2248PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners William H. Zuhone, Jr. and his wife Audra have appealed from a decision of the Tax Court holding that there was a deficiency in income tax amounting to $467,746.91 for 1975 (App. A15). The Tax Court held that certain overriding royalty interests in oil and gas wells must be included in petitioners’ 1975 and 1976 taxable income 1 and also accepted the evaluation of those interests supplied by the Commissioner’s expert. The propriety of these two rulings is now before us. 2 We affirm.

I. Propriety of Income Tax Treatment of Taxpayer’s Royalty Interests

When…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Rauenhorst v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  3. James A. Pittman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Gary L. Eyler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API