Legal Opinion
Newmark v. C & C Super Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner, a director of the respondent, which is a Delaware corporation, has an absolute, unqualified right to inspect its books and records (Matter of Cohen v. CoeoKne Prods., 309 N. V. 119, 123). A director has that right with respect to a foreign corporation if it actively functions within the State (see Matter of Bogers v. American Tobacco Co., 143 Mise. 306, affd. 233 App. Div. 708; Matter of Lanin v. Lanin Go., 264 App. Div. 205). It is charged that the respondent has removed its records to Englewood, New Jersey, or is about to do so. It is also claimed that the respondent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Minas De Artemisa, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Rogers v. American Tobacco Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- National Distilling Co. v. Van EmdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Gemson v. PerreaultAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- In re LavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Starbare II Partners, L. P. v. SloanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995