Legal Opinion
In re E.A.H.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 1992No. 88-FS-1319PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
E.A.H., who was fourteen years of age at the time of the offense, was tried as a juvenile and adjudicated delinquent after having been found guilty at a bench trial of assault with a dangerous weapon and related possessory weapons charges. The case stemmed from the shooting of one Bruce Gaddy. On appeal, E.A.H. contends that the motions judge committed reversible error by denying his motion to suppress incriminating statements which E.A.H. made to police while a search warrant was being executed at his home. The motions judge held that E.A.H. was not in custody when…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Morris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.