Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2004No. 02-CF-527PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted James E. Hill of voluntary manslaughter while armed, as a lesser-included offense of second-degree murder while armed, and related weapons offenses. 1 He principally claims on appeal that the police violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination by eliciting an incriminating statement from him in the absence of Miranda 2 warnings. We agree that the trial court should have suppressed the incriminating statement and therefore reverse his convictions and remand the case for a new trial. We have previously “ad monished the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. HamblyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. McCoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. SawyerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API