Hill v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted James E. Hill of voluntary manslaughter while armed, as a lesser-included offense of second-degree murder while armed, and related weapons offenses. 1 He principally claims on appeal that the police violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination by eliciting an incriminating statement from him in the absence of Miranda 2 warnings. We agree that the trial court should have suppressed the incriminating statement and therefore reverse his convictions and remand the case for a new trial. We have previously “ad monished the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. HamblyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- McCoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. SawyerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.