Pounds v. Litaker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
This appeal involves tbe question whether or not tbe engraved monogram of Mrs. Efird, wbicb appears on tbe paper writing under consideration, may be construed to be ber signature. If such monogram is insufficient as a signature within tbe meaning of tbe statute with respect to tbe execution of holographic wills, then it will be unnecessary to consider tbe other exceptions presented and argued.
It is provided by statute G.S. 31-18 tbat wills must be admitted to probate only in tbe manner prescribed therein. Sub-section 2 of this statute, among other things, provides, “In case of a holograph…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- In Re Will of LowranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- In Re the Will of WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- In Re Will of GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- In Re the Last Will & Testament of ParsonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Estate of MulkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Prisland v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Elkins v. MulkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- In Re the Will of AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002