Legal Opinion

Prisland v. Robinson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Ordinarily, Wisconsin does not recognize a holographic will as valid since it does not comply with our statutory requirements as set forth in sec. 238.06, Stats. However, under the Uniform Foreign Executed Wills Act, sec. 238.07, if the testament is valid in the state where it was executed, it. shall be deemed legally executed for purposes of Wisconsin law. Thus, if the will were executed in South Dakota, the Wisconsin courts would be obliged to determine whether it conforms to South Dakota law, and, if it does, we would then treat it as a valid testamentary disposition. The trial court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Irvine's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Estate of Bower (1938)California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McCormick v. HerndonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Estate of DurlewangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. In Re Estate of HailSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Carson v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Estate of MolayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API