Legal Opinion

Elkins v. Mulkins

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1706PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

We must decide whether a document written by the decedent, Frank N. Mulkins, on a stationer’s will form is a valid holograph which can be admitted to probate under the laws of this state.1 The trial judge relying upon In re Bower’s Estate, 11 Cal.2d 180, 78 P.2d 1012 (1938) found the document was written by decedent but denied probate because it was written on a printed form. The instrument reads as follows (handwriting of decedent italicized) :

"NO BONDS REQUIRED.

LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT

/s/ Frank N. Mulkins

In the name of God, Amen. I, FRANK N. MULKINS, of the City of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Estate of Bower (1938)California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Knauff v. DavidsonArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Charles H. Cook Bible School v. CollierArizona Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of MulkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API