In Re Will of Goodman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
The paper writing propounded as the will of Mary Elkins Goodman was duly proven in accordance with the statute, G.S. 31-3, by the subscribing witnesses to the typewritten portion and by proof of the handwriting of the testatrix as to the written portions offered as a holograph codicil. But the caveator assigns error in the ruling of the court below that the writing bv pen and ink on the typewritten will, which writing was entirely in the handwriting of the testatrix and again signed by her and found among her valuable papers, was sufficient, if so found by the jury, to constitute a valid…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Peace v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Paul v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- In Re Will of LowranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- In Re the Last Will & Testament of RoedigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Armstrong Ex Rel. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- In Re the Will of WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- In Re the Estate of BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Pounds v. LitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.