Riva v. Pepsico, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
(Docket No. 52)
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendant Pepsico, Inc.’s (“Pepsi’s”) Motion to Dis*1049miss the Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Riva and Ardagna (collectively “Riva Plaintiffs”). Docket No. 52 (“Motion”). The operative complaint is the First Amended Complaint. Docket No. 51.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Nine putative class actions were filed against Pepsi. In general, each action originally alleged that certain Pepsi products contain a carcinogen, 4-methylimida-zole (“4-MeI”), at levels that…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cahen v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Barnes v. The Coca-Cola Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Hanieh Iravanian v. Transperfect Translations International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Kanaga v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- TIGER v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025