Legal Opinion
Kanaga v. Monsanto Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 10, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01882Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GLENN KANAGA, et al., ) CASE NO. 1:23-cv-1882 ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) CHIEF JUDGE SARA LIOI ) ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER MONSANTO COMPANY, ) ) ) DEFENDANT. ) Before the Court are two motions. First, defendant Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”) has moved to dismiss. (Doc. No. 8 (Motion to Dismiss).) Second, in lieu of opposing the motion to dismiss, plaintiffs Glenn and Darcie Kanaga (the “Kanagas”) concede that their complaint does not meet federal pleading standards and have moved to amend. (Doc. No. 10 (Motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Brenda Bickerstaff v. Vincent LucarelliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Courie v. Alcoa Wheel & Forged ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.