Legal Opinion
Black v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1932No. Docket No. 8023PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of defendant Southern Pacific Company, and from a judgment of nonsuit entered in favor of the other defendants.
On January 19, 1927, plaintiff Florence M. Black was injured when an automobile which she was driving collided' with the standard of a wigwag signal near the tracks of the Southern Pacific Company where the same are crossed by Embarcadero Road in the city of Palo Alto. Embarcadero Road was formerly paved with a strip of macadam 18 feet in width extending from the highway,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Watson v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Belcher v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.