Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Palmer Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1956No. Civ. 21325PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of dismissal entered after the court, at a pretrial hearing, sustained the objection of “Bob ’N Del, a corporation,” to the introduction of any evidence against it. The objection was sustained on.the ground the action as against the corporation was barred by the statute of limitations at the time it was assertedly made a party defendant.

The action is for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff Laura Lee Thompson on November 5, 1952, and for damages for loss of services by plaintiff George J. Thompson.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Balaklala Corsol. Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1912
  2. Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Kimball & Austin Manufacturing Co. v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Thompson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sierra Club, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Stephens v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Ingram v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Oliver v. the Swiss Club TellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Hawkins v. Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API