Legal Opinion
Sisney v. Reisch
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 6, 2008No. CIV 03-4260PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Strike, Doc. 272, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 214, on the grounds of qualified immunity and the merits. In a separate brief, Defendants also seek summary judgment on any claims asserted under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000ce-2000cc-5, on the grounds that RLUIPA is unconstitutional. The Court allowed the United States to intervene for presentation of evidence and for argument on the question of…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van Wyhe v. ReischCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Pugh v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Sisney v. ReischCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- El Badrawi v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Van Wyhe v. ReischDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.