Legal Opinion

Van Wyhe v. Reisch

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 13, 2008No. CIV 07-4013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 33. Plaintiff submitted a response to the motion indicating that he is not able to respond to the motion without the assistance of counsel. Defendants then submitted a reply. Plaintiff filed a response to the Defendants’ reply, again stating he cannot respond to the motion without the assistance of counsel and requesting that this action be set for trial. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion will be denied in part and granted in part.

I.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Wyhe v. ReischCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Holton v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
  3. James Van Wyhe v. Tim ReischCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Monteer v. ABL Management Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  5. Monteer v. ABL Management Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API